Comments on: Rumor of the day: Ultimate Airball vs SupAir

By: The World of Paintball | Real Xtreme Paintball's Blog

The World of Paintball | Real Xtreme Paintball's Blog — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:33:05 +0000

[...] Rumor of the day: Ultimate Airball vs SupAir | Pro Paintball … [...]

By: just my opinion

just my opinion — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:59:19 +0000

Being a part of the whole UAPL/WPL experience was interesting. YES, there is a bunch of money owed. YES, there are fields owed. I would love to see that money come back to me and my team. I would love to see a return on my investment.But the answer wont be bashing Milt, Craig or UA. I have used both systems and I have to say they both work well. Some people prefer Supair, some UA.
It really is up to the courts to decide the outcome of the patent questions. I am not taking sides, but I must say that Milt did accomplish something amazing, and that was getting the WPL on tv. It may have crashed and burned but it was a valiant attempt. I wish that it had worked, it was awesome.There is definitely room for more than one bunker company. Let them all try and may the best bunker win.

By: Dont worry about it

Dont worry about it — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:28:13 +0000

Hey if Ultimate Airball wants to talk law, how about them not giving their advertised prizes out for tournaments.

Such as the top gun tournament at Ultimate Madness, last person to win that never received their “5man airball field” after years of trying to contact Milt Call for their EARNED prize.

By: Sup’Airball response to Craig Miller’s claims « Helsinki Cyclone

Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:30:37 +0000

[...] and the possible legal action towards Sup’Airball – originally found on ProPaintball.com. The Ford Report posted Craig Miller’s somewhat heated response to the rumors in this [...]

By: Damien from Sup'AirBall

Damien from Sup'AirBall — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:50:03 +0000

I will post Sup’AirBall official answer to Mr. Miller’s claims tomorrow, Jan. 06th.
Misleading and false claims will be addressed to set the record straight and the truth will prevail.

Sorry i cannot comment more today… Stay tuned for more. It’s worth it.

By: He

He — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:59:30 +0000

Don’t believe everything u see on the internet! ;o)

By: He

He — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:58:10 +0000

Short memory for some, stupidity for others:
Supair first bunkers were tubeless, with anchors and all that in 1998. That means UA has an invalid patent.
As some of you said, UA owes money to a bunch of teams… that was a nice try to get some $$$ from Supair

By: CANEFAN4LIFE

CANEFAN4LIFE — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 03:17:42 +0000

wow. thats all i can say. im done with tournament paintball if UA comes back. this is ridiculous. how come it took them THIS LONG to even decide to sue. its all Jealousy

By: OG

OG — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:23:11 +0000

Wrong, Ultimate introduced TUBELESS inflatable bunkers.
Source:In 1999, Brimstone Enterprises founders Craig Miller and Milt Call conceived and created the first successful tubeless inflatable Paintball bunker systems. A Patent Application was promptly submitted.

By: nick

nick — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:25:32 +0000

“Sup’Air Adrenaline Games first introduced inflatable air bunkers in 1997 in Toulouse, bringing tournament paintball out of the woods and onto the turf via a system of interconnected tubes supplying air to each of the bunkers. While this moment is a sure landmark in paintball history, this lawsuit could mark interesting times ahead for AdrenalineGames / Sup’Air.”

Ultimate Airball first introduced inflatable air bunkers.

Might want to edit your article.

By: SPcanSuckIt

SPcanSuckIt — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:52:16 +0000

Oh good, another Smart Parts. Hey Ultimate, just remember that what goes around, comes around.